SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Humberto Barreto <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:26:42 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (6 kB) , text/html (7 kB)
Published by EH.Net (August 2022).

Thomas Moser and Marcel Savioz, eds. *Karl Brunner and Monetarism*.
Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2022. xii + 491 pp. $50 (hardcover), ISBN
978-0262046916.

Reviewed by Forrest Capie, Bayes Business School, City, University of
London.



Karl Brunner was a distinguished economist and a leading figure in the
Monetarist school of monetary economics. He may or may not have coined the
word Monetarist, but he is credited with the first use of the term in a
lecture in 1968. His published output in many different forms was
prodigious – more than 200 articles and books. Brunner was also an academic
entrepreneur. He established what became two leading journals, the *Journal
of Money, Credit and Banking* and the *Journal of Monetary Economics*. He
also established and ran two important seminars, the Carnegie-Rochester
Conference in the US and the Konstanz Seminar in Germany, both of which are
still in good health today. More than that, in 1973 he co-founded with
Allan Meltzer the Shadow Open Market Committee (that provides an
alternative assessment and policy recommendations to the Fed’s FOMC) –
again, still thriving.

He was first of all a Swiss economist, and his first employment was as an
economist in the Swiss National Bank (SNB). On the centenary of his birth
in 2016 the SNB established the annual Karl Brunner Distinguished Lecture
Series and together with the inaugural lecture held a seminar at which
Allan Meltzer, Ernst Baltensperger, Benjamin Friedman, and Charles Plosser
presented papers that were in large part tributes to a scholar they clearly
revered. These papers and the inaugural lecture by Kenneth Rogoff (on
central bank design) make up Part I of this book. Following the seminar,
David Laidler and Michel de Vroey suggested to the editors that the
proposed publication could and should be broadened with contributors
invited to explore Brunner’s work and legacy.

There is an excellent Foreword by the Chairman of the SNB, Thomas Jordan,
and an introduction by the editors, Thomas Moser and Marcel Savioz, both of
the SNB. The book then has four parts: Part I, ‘A Tribute to Karl Brunner,’
as described above; Part II, ‘The Impact of the Monetary Policy Debate’;
Part III, ‘Karl Brunner and Allan Meltzer’s Monetarism’; and Part IV,
‘Today’s Legacy of Karl Brunner’. In all there are 16 contributors from 14
different institutions and seven countries. Not all the contributors would
claim to be, or have been, monetarists. It was the range of Brunner’s work
that attracted and involved them.

Brunner held that macroeconomic analysis must be based on individual
behaviour, that is to say on price theory. He argued that was the core
feature of Monetarism: ‘The basic tenet of Monetarism is the reassertion of
the relevance of price theory to understand what happens in aggregate
economics. Our fundamental point is that price theory is the crucial
paradigm – as a matter of fact, the only paradigm – that economists have’
(p.vii). In the mid-1980s when Brunner was asked (in an interview with Arjo
Klamer) when he became a monetarist he said he believed it began with his
conversations with Armen Alchian in the early 1950s. This is the subject of
Pierrick Clerc’s chapter, ‘The Pervasive Influence of Armen Alchian on Karl
Brunner’s Monetarism.’ Clerc notes and agrees with the view David Laidler
had expressed ten years earlier that Brunner’s ‘version of Monetarism paid
more attention to the information problems that lay at the heart of
monetary economics than did Friedman’ (p. 321). Laidler’s own chapter here
touches on both these questions.

In fact there is quite a lot on the importance of price theory for
Brunner’s work in the book. Clerc and Michel de Vroey’s chapter, ‘Brunner
versus Friedman: Diverging Aspirations for the Monetarist Project,’ is
explicitly on the subject. James Forder’s ‘Karl Brunner’s Monetarist
Revolution’ offers a substantial and generally critical section on
Friedman’s views on the ‘counter revolution’ and related topics, before
contrasting this with Brunner. Additionally, in Part III there is a chapter
by Kevin Hoover on Brunner’s philosophy of science.

There is plenty for the monetary historian in Part II. Brunner had a keen
interest in history. He edited a splendid volume on the Great Depression.
He wrote with Allan Meltzer a long report on the Federal Reserve’s first
fifty years, explored among other things by Michael Bordo in ‘Karl Brunner
and Allan Meltzer: From Monetary Policy to Monetary History to Monetary
Rules’. There is also a very long piece by Edward Nelson on the British
monetary policy debate, starting where Brunner first worked on British
monetary policy in the early 1950s and continuing to when he was in close
contact with Margaret Thatcher in the late 1980s. Jurgen von Hagen provides
some history of economic thought as he places Brunner’s views of the 1960s
in a long-term perspective. In a separate chapter von Hagen describes the
origins and development of the Konstanz Seminar, founded after Brunner
became a permanent visiting professor at the University of Konstanz in 1969.

In the final Part, on Brunner’s legacy, there are papers by Alex Cukierman
(the permanent-transitory hypothesis), Juan Pablo Nicolini (Brunner’s
theory of the money supply), and Stephen Williamson (on Monetarism and New
Monetarism). All of these illustrate how Brunner’s ideas have had a lasting
impact on the subject. Monetarism has certainly evolved, but New
Monetarists are still interested in the fundamental role of money.

This is a large book covering most aspects of Brunner’s work, and it will
surely have appeal across a wide readership. The book is a powerful
reminder of the range and subtlety of Brunner’s work. It will also serve as
a caution to those who have been quick to dismiss Monetarism, and even
claim it dead.



Forrest Capie is a former editor of the *Economic History Review*, and
Commissioned Historian of the Bank of England. A recent publication was on
the Bank of England’s profits across 300 years in the *Financial History
Review*, 2022.

Copyright (c) 2022 by EH.Net. All rights reserved. This work may be copied
for non-profit educational uses if proper credit is given to the author and
the list. For other permission, please contact the EH.Net Administrator (
[log in to unmask]). Published by EH.Net (August 2022). All EH.Net
reviews are archived at https://www.eh.net/book-reviews.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2