SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: OUP series
From:
abdullah erkul <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
abdullah erkul <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:18:24 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (944 bytes) , text/html (4 kB) 
I vote for Jan Tinbergen.. 


 

Abdullah Erkul 

Research Assistant
Department of Economics, Balikesir University - Balikesir
and Middle East Technical University - Ankara





>________________________________
> From: "Womack, John" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask] 
>Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 6:13 PM
>Subject: Re: [SHOE] OUP series
> 
>
>
> 
>Following Theocarakis, I too vote for Richard Goodwin.
> 
>From:Societies for the History of Economics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Theocarakis
>Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 7:46 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [SHOE] OUP series
> 
>Hirschman is also my first choice.  I would like also to see a volume on the sterling contributions of Richard Goodwin.
> 
>On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Antonio Bianco <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>OUP = Sir John (Hicks)
> 
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2