TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Charles Crow <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Apr 1998 16:47:43 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Let's go back to the beginning of this string.  A scholar asked for
suggestions for reading on a specific topic.  I responded with a summary of
a recent work which seemed relevant, without necessarily endorsing it.
Does anyone question the accuracy of my summary?  Does anyone have anything
else useful to say in response to the orginal request?  No?  I thought not.

I'd like to get off this, since the "discourse community" this forum has
most resembled in the last two days is a high-school study hall.

Charles Crow

ATOM RSS1 RSS2