TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Harold Bush <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:01:16 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Friends, I've not heard any response, and so suppose the quotation
supposedly by MT about the Civil War being about Scott vs. Burns to be
false.  I sent this to my colleague, who wrote back the following:

I think the canard is based on Twain's comments (which are really sharp and
very funny) about the pernicious influence of Scott on the culture of the
antebellum south in *Life on the Mississippi*. This was picked up and
transformed by Burnsians into a claim that what Twain *meant* was that the
civil war was a fight between an aristocratic feudal set of myths, and a
more democratic view of the world. The earliest reference to the Scott v.
Burns / confederacy v. union analogy is in a pretty forgotten work (Dudley
Wright, *Robert Burns and Freemasonry,* 1921), p. 106. No source for the
claim is given, but its now commonly repeated by Burns scholars as gospel.

just thought you might like to know, best wishes and happy holidays, --Hal
B.

-- 
Harold K. Bush, Ph.D
Professor of English
Saint Louis University
St. Louis, MO  63108
314-977-3616 (w); 314-771-6795 (h)
<www.slu.edu/x23809.xml>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2