TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ben Friedlander <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Dec 1995 20:33:29 -0500
Organization:
University at Buffalo
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)

I'll have to look up that Jane Smiley article in Harper's. It seems a
strange argument on two counts: First, while _Uncle Tom_ does treat
slavery in a more directly serious manner than _Huck Finn_ (with the
emphasis on direct), Stowe's characters (misunderstood these days
no less than Twain's) pose their own difficulties for a modern reader.
Replacing "Nigger Jim" with "Uncle Tom" and "Topsy" looks like treading
water to me, racial-politics-wise. Second, while the end of _Huck Finn_ may
be slower going than the start, the boring parts of _Uncle Tom_ are
evenly distributed throughout, like the fat in a pound of ground beef.

Scott, I agree with your defense of _HF_. My vote still goes to _The Scarlet
Letter_.

Ben F.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2