TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:38:36 -0600
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
Martin Zehr <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
And, to add to Kevin's insights, it would make sense that a sawyer might be
more of a nuisance to navigation on the Missouri River than the
Mississippi.  Heaving wood scraps into the river, or moving raw timber on
the river, in those pre-EPA days, would certainly have more impact on the
generally much narrower Missouri River than the Mississippi. The Missouri,
from its confluence with the Mississippi, going west and north, is
navigable at least as far as Omaha, but the steamboats Clemens piloted were
generally much larger than those on the Mississippi.  He was, however,
familiar with the Missouri, and when he absquatulated to the West with his
brother Orion, it was via the Missouri to St. Joseph, where they caught
their coach heading west across Kansas and the Nebraska territory.
MZ

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Kevin Mac Donnell <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I think it's a reasonable assumption, if not a given. I've talked about it
> in one of my essays (I forget which one), pointing out that Tom, like a
> sawyer, pops up unpredictably and causes trouble each time. More than a
> mere
> annoyance, he represents a threat to Huck and Jim's navigation away from
> conformity.
>
> The earliest I can recall seeing the sawyer=Sawyer connection being made is
> in William G. Barrett's `On the Naming of Tom Sawyer', Psychoanalytic
> Quarterly 24:3 (1955), but Barrett simply notes it as a possible source and
> then dives back into his absurd psycho-babble about how Tom got his name.
> His essay is worth reading as an example of how far out on a limb
> psychological theory can climb--I guess that's where the nuts are. But
> Barrett's nonsense was so silly that I once wondered if his article was a
> hoax intended to make fun of Freudian claptrap of the 1950s, when no cigar
> was just a cigar. Barrett says Tom starts with T just like Twain, and
> Sawyer
> starts with S just like Sam. Hence, Sam Twain. and therefore Tom Sawyer.
> Voila! I'm not making this up, but Barrett uses jargon to explain it, so it
> must be true.
>
> And on the subject of Tom Sawyer's name, he was not named after a San
> Francisco fireman. Pure bunk. Smoke without the mirrors, and no fire
> either.
>
> However, my wonderful wonderful black cat, Felix, was indeed named after a
> more famous cat of the same name, and I was named after one of my
> grandfather's friends, Kevin Barry, who upset the English so much they
> hanged him. I hope nobody is upset by my musings on the naming of Tom
> Sawyer.
>
> Kevin
> @
> Mac Donnell Rare Books
> 9307 Glenlake Drive
> Austin TX 78730
> 512-345-4139
> Member: ABAA, ILAB
> *************************
> You may browse our books at:
> www.macdonnellrarebooks.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Holmes
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 1:44 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Just wondering about Sawyers
>
> I've been working on my Roughing It videos and lessons and came across
> discussions of sawyers as nuisances to navigation. Â In these instances
> they referred to the Missouri rather than the Mississippi. Â I was just
> thinking that the thought of them being nuisances might have inspired
> Twain to name his most popular nuisance Sawyer, Tom Sawyer.
>
> --
> There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of
>                           in your philosophy.
>                         http://bscottholmes.com
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2