TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:22:10 -0400
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
David Davis <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
[FYI, I just posted this to the NYT's article site. /DDD ]


Since we can't reach Henry Rogers of Standard Oil to help out Mr Clemens
one more time, I see two sustainable routes to resolving the capital and
cash flow issue with this national treasure. (And possibly a third, a
blend of the first two.)

A) Nationalize it. Allocate responsibility for the MT House to the
National Park Service. If there is an American author who better merits
this honor, I don't know who it is.

B) Acquire patrons for a sizable capital fund. For example, solicit
living American authors for "planned giving" committments to come out of
their estates at the time of their deaths. (Asking them for money now
wouldn't be a bad idea either, but we have to solve this problem, not
patch it). Names like Roth, Updike, Kingsolver, Oates, Barry, King,
Irving, Wolfe, Halperin and O'Rourke come to mind. Corporate sponsors
who have benefitted from Twain's works in the public domain - Disney,
for one - ought also to considering stepping up.

C) Do both. There's no reason the approach needs to be all private or
all public.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2