TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Benjamin GRIFFIN <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 9 Mar 2019 10:45:59 -0800
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
The most substantial source of information is *Letters from Nevada
Territory 1861-1862* (by Marsh) and *Reports of the 1863 Constitutional
Convention* (by Clemens, Marsh and Bowman) (Reno: Legislative Council
Bureau, 1972).

On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 8:44 AM Kit Farwell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>      Thank you Benjamin and Robert!   It makes sense that Andrew J. Marsh
> was correspondent as the very detailed reporting must have been from
> shorthand and he wrote Marsh' New Manual of Reformed Phonetic Shorthand.
>     I see that Mark Twain of the Enterprise has a long section on the
> legislative reporters; Sam attending the House and Clement T. Rice
> (Virginia City Daily Union) attending the Council sessions and
> collaborating, along with Marsh (Sacramento Daily Union).
>     Did Rice know shorthand?  It would be hard to report on both houses if
> he didn't write shorthand.
>     I wonder if Marsh attended mostly the House or the House sessions?
>
> Thanks - Kit
> Kit Farwell
> [log in to unmask]
>


-- 
Benjamin Griffin
Associate Editor, Mark Twain Project
The Bancroft Library
University of California, Berkeley 94720-6000
(510) 664-4238

ATOM RSS1 RSS2