TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 4 Dec 2016 18:33:03 +0000
Reply-To:
Clay Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
Clay Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
I'm reading Holbrook's autobiography now; thus, I differ with that assertion, because Holbrook had years of stage experience before "becoming" Mark Twain.
If anything, Kilmer is a cub in comparison to Mr. H. - B. Clay Shannon

      From: Alan Kitty <[log in to unmask]>
 To: [log in to unmask] 
 Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2016 9:24 AM
 Subject: Re: Brief Movie Review
   
... or it is an early interpretation of Twain's reported slow drawl delivery=
.
I submit that Holbrook might have had a similar interpretation in 1954. IHe M=
AY NOT HAVE BEEN AS GOOD, since Kilmer's film experience when he started doi=
ng Twain was deep and Holbrook's was not
AK
Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 2, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Scott Holmes <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>=20
> For whatever it's worth, Kilmer was a great Doc Holliday, in an
> otherwise ridiculous movie.  I've seen a couple of clips of Kilmer as
> Twain and they all seemed to represent Twain as a drunkard.


   

ATOM RSS1 RSS2