TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Mar 1997 10:46:24 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Personally, I prefer books which are slanted wierdly over those which are
slanted conventionally.

I love it when our controversies are related to Twain studies.  This is
much more interesting than the question of why Taylor's requests--that
people not quote entire original messages, etc.--are seemingly ignored.
Or how many pedantic beverages I am committed to buy in August in Elmira.
Etcetera.

I hadn't responded to Kathy's query because I haven't read both books.
Between what Shelley wrote and what Shelley edited, Oxford Books took all
my money before Andy's book was published.  While I wait for my finances
to recoup, I hope Kathy O'Connell will put her story online, so I'll have
more previews to ponder.

If Twainiacs are mean drunks, I'm going to renig on my beverage promise.

larry marshburne

ATOM RSS1 RSS2