SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
HES: DISC -- Rise and Fall of Monetarism
From:
[log in to unmask] (A. M. C. Waterman)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:40 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
Regarding Michael Perelman's question: 
 
Why must it have been one thing or the other? Is it not more likely to be 
the case, as with almost every other interaction of economic theory with 
political doctrine, that it was both? 
 
Anthony Waterman 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2