No, it would not, since Clower was at UCLA until at least the late 80s.

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Ric Holt <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Yes, Bob Clower would make sense.
>
> Ric Holt
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Colander, David C. <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> It could have been Bob  Clower
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Dec 16, 2015, at 8:41 AM, Robert Leeson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> In 1978, Hayek stated
>>
>>
>>
>> I am rather hoping that these ideas are now spreading. Of course, I think
>> the main thing is that there are economists who are working outside their
>> fields, like Jim Buchanan and [the one] in South Carolina, and some of the
>> people working at UCLA. What I said before--that you cannot be a good
>> economist except by being more than an economist-- I think is being
>> recognized by more and more of the economists. This narrow specialization,
>> particularly of the mathematical economists, is, I believe, going out.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hayek plagiarized material from John C. Calhoun: but what in South
>> Carolina is Hayek referring to?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
E. Roy Weintraub
Professor of Economics
Fellow, Center for the History of Political Economy
<http://hope.econ.duke.edu/>
Duke University
www.econ.duke.edu/~erw/erw.homepage.html
https://www.facebook.com/FindingEquilibriumDuppeWeintraub
<http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10206.html>