TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ioram Melcer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Feb 1996 18:53:43 +0200
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
I would suggest taking into account the following:

(1) Nominalization historically used 'that' (building a noun out of a
phrase with a verb was done with such phrases which had 'that' at the
beginning)

(2) Wh- elements were seen mostly as tending to indicate potential more
than actual truth values.

(3) When 'who' is used to nominalize it's usually in "whoever" or "he
who..", which supports points (1) and (2).

That's, in short, the news from sunny Israel.

Shalom,

Ioram Melcer

ATOM RSS1 RSS2