TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Hal Bush <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:03:11 -0600
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
thanks Sean; that's a great point.  early conspiracy theory at its most
laughable!  -hb


On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Sean Russell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dar Hal:
>
> Condolences.  I was very curious about this odd idea that Oxford wrote
> Shakespeare and did some reading into this area at one point.   The thing
> that really made me laugh - literally - was reading some of the poetry
> attributed to the Earl of Oxford (you can find this on the pro-Oxford sites
> so they don't deny the earl wrote it).  Part way through the third poem I
> could not stop laughing.  People think this amateur wrote the works of
> Shakespeare?  Of course the Oxford supporters will claim the earl wrote
> that
> mediocre poetry so no one would guess he was the genius behind the poetry
> of
> Shakespeare - because no self-respecting aristocrat would like to be known
> as a literary genius.  They'd much rather be known as a barely competent
> dabbler.
>
> Best,
>
> Sean Russell
>



-- 
Prof. Harold K. Bush
Professor of English
3800 Lindell
Saint Louis University
St. Louis, MO  63108
314-977-3616 (w); 314-771-6795 (h)
<www.slu.edu/x23809.xml>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2